Cases 11 - 20 of 228
PATRICK v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN PATRICK
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS doing business as SCI FOREST, RANDY IRWIN, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STURGIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04409
Defendant:
SERGEANT QADIRAH THOMAS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LIEUTENANT WAYNE LYONS and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS STURGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
MARIO GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MS. WALKER, DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, MAC JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian Owens v. Deb, et al
as 23-2361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN OWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB, Kitchen Aide/Summit FOods FCJ, KERRY, TIFFANY, Kitchen Aide/Summit Foods FCJ and others
USA v. Christian Womack
as 23-2342
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK, also known as Gucci Prada
Owens v. Williams
as 4:2023cv00898
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Jamie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Pinckney v. Bernadette Mason, et al
as 23-1817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT PINCKNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNADETTE MASON, CHRISTIAN HAUSE, DR. PINKY BORA-SAIKIA and others
Siddeeq Henry v. Christian Smith, et al
as 23-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIDDEEQ HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CHRISTIAN SMITH, LIEUTENANT FOX, CAPTAIN OSHENRIDER and others
RAY v. CAMACHO et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. RAY
Defendant:
MS. CAMACHO, CHRISTIAN SMITH and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carty v. Testamark et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Chris Carty
Defendant:
W. Testamark, B. Adams, J. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
