Cases 11 - 20 of 20
WILSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv00651
Petitioner:
JOHN D. WILSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VAZQUEZ v. WILSON et al
as 2:2012cv07197
Petitioner:
ANTHONY E. VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC D. WILSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landor v. Wilson et al
as 1:2012cv01329
Petitioner:
Damon Landor
Respondent:
Eric D Wilson, Timothy Harding and M Raitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2009cv03686
Plaintiff:
HOWARD D. WILSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONS and JOHN VERNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. BENDER et al
as 3:2009cv01561
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
FRED BENDER and TRAVIS MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Shannon et al
as 3:2008cv02145
Petitioner:
John D. Wilson
Respondent:
Robert Shannon, ., Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILSON v. MAXWELL et al
as 3:2008cv04140
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN D. WILSON
Defendant:
TRAVIS MAXWELL and FRED BENDER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Wilson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 08-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. WILSON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTY GEN PA
Wilson v. Pa. Bd. of Probation/Parole et al
as 3:2007cv01487
Petitioner:
John D. Wilson
Respondent:
Pa. Bd. of Probation/Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. McVey et al
as 1:2007cv01301
Plaintiff:
John D. Wilson
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, Allen Castor, Jeffrey Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
