Cases 11 - 20 of 21
RICHARDSON v. HAMM et al
as 2:2016cv02684
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
HAMM, SERGI, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. MCFADDEN
as 2:2016cv02228
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant:
EDWARD D. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv01466
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Richardson v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 13-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN THOMPSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv01238
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, et al
as 11-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ and ATTY GEN PA
RICHARDSON v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2010cv02502
Petitioner:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, JR. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Richardson v. Ron Diehl
as 09-3627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RON DIEHL
RICHARDSON v. DIEHL
as 2:2008cv01632
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RON DIEHL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2007cv04677
Petitioner:
DAVID DEWEES RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
