Cases 11 - 20 of 34
In re: Ronald Bricker v. Commonwealth of PA
as 09-4141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR., Pa. Attorney General and EDWARD G. RENDELL, Governor of Pa.
HUMPHRIES et al v. DUTRIELLE et al
as 2:2009cv01325
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUMPHRIES, JERMAIN DUTRIELLE, NATHAN HACK and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHRIES v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUMPHRIES
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Crumb, et al
as 09-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS, Sovereign
Defendant - Appellee:
CRUMB, VOJACEK, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARRASQUILLO v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv00347
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARRASQUILLO
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUTTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
HEATH LEE SUTTON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WESLEY v. GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
as 3:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
POLITE et al v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv05329
Plaintiff:
WILLIE POLITE, JR., GREGORY STOVER, ALLEN GINN and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, CATHERINE MCVEY, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Rendell
as 08-3388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
