Cases 11 - 20 of 26
ROUDABUSH v. DYNAN et al
as 1:2015cv04234
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
C. DYNAN, R. HAZELWOOD, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEINBERG v. HUNDLEY et al
as 3:2014cv07660
Plaintiff:
PAULIE STEINBERG
Defendant:
PATRICIA HUNDLEY, REGINA GRIMES, ZARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston Grimes v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 14-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON ROBERT GRIMES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY
Grimes v. Wenerowicz et al
as 3:2013cv01819
Petitioner:
Preston Grimes
Respondent:
Mike Wenerowicz, PA State Attorney General and Dauphin County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Wenerowicz
as 3:2013cv01122
Petitioner:
Preston Robert Grimes
Respondent:
Mike Wenerowicz and PA State Attorney General
Receiver:
York County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COPE v. KOHLER et al
as 1:2012cv05188
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS C. COPE
Defendant:
DAVE KOHLER, JOHN FINE, MICHAEL KRUG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Grimes v. Michelle Ricci
as 11-3430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD GRIMES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, ADMINISTRATOR
MARTIN v. FBOP COLEMAN PRISON et al
as 2:2011cv03495
Plaintiff:
TYRONE MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
FBOP COLEMAN PRISON, SHU STAFF ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIONAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMES v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv03146
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND GRIMES
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Grimes v. Michelle Ricci
as 10-4313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD GRIMES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, ADMINISTRATOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
