Cases 11 - 20 of 177
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT. KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nedrick Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
NEDRICK LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW
MCCUNE v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. MCCUNE, JR.
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. WALKER, C.O. MOHNEY, SGT. LESKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PINEDA DURAN v. LOWE
as 2:2023cv02019
Petitioner:
JOSE PINEDA DURAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF PIKE COUNT CRAIGE LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Lowe, et al
as 4:2023cv01896
Petitioner:
Damion Davis
Defendant:
Craig Lowe, Corrections Lieutenant Fagan, Linda Forshay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Khalil Hammond
Defendant:
Superintendent Gourley, C.O. Zimmerman, C.O. Iagavino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAGNE v. LOWE et al
as 2:2023cv01622
Petitioner:
NATNAEL T. DAGNE
Respondent:
CRAIGE LOWE and WARDEN OF PIKE COUNTY CORR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Lowe
as 1:2023cv01045
Petitioner:
Kemar Rogelo White
Respondent:
Craig Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
