Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Widdoes v. Malone et al
as 1:2012cv01255
Plaintiff:
Kameron Kenneth Widdoes
Defendant:
P. Malone , Sherkey , Unnamed K-9 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WILLIAMS v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2010cv05120
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD, WESTLEY DILKS, MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2010cv05043
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. PATTERSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD, WESTLEY DILKS, MS. MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2010cv05039
Plaintiff:
JAMAL JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BRADFORD, WESTLEY DILKS, MS. MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Malone v. Brian v. Coleman, et al
as 10-2508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY DION MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
DA LANCASTER, ATTY GEN PA and BRIAN COLEMAN
HARPER v. MALONE
as 2:2010cv00410
Plaintiff:
ELTON D. HARPER
Defendant:
R.D. MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. LACORTE et al
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
NAJA CUMMINGS
Defendant:
JAMES S. LACORTE, JOHN F. MALONE, LENETTA HUMPHREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2009cv02656
Petitioner:
TERRY DION MALONE
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Coleman et al
as 4:2009cv00892
Petitioner:
Terry Dion Malone
Respondent:
Brian V. Coleman and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00063
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Parker, Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
