Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Braxton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Savino Braxton
Defendant:
United States of America, William Barr, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHENG v. GARLAND
as 1:2022cv07442
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LODUCA v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2022cv01881
Petitioner:
JOSEPH LODUCA
Respondent:
JOSEPH BIDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02141
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lee v. McCauley et al
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lee
Defendant:
Lt. C. McCauley, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Henareh v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Petitioner:
Siavosh Henareh
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NICOLL v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2022cv02336
Petitioner:
DAVID G NICOLL
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Mr. MICHAEL CARVAJAL and ALIX M MCLEAREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguilar v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Oscar Contreras Aguilar
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, JOHN DOE, SIA Canfield and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
