Cases 11 - 20 of 68
NUR QADR v. EMPLOYEE WONDERLING
as 2:2019cv01488
Plaintiff:
NUR QADR and MR. JEFFREY PRATT
Defendant:
EMPLOYEE WONDERLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
AURSBY v. LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv04849
Defendant:
SHAWN WIELAGE, ERIC FRIES, WARREN M. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LAMAR AURSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Department of Justice (DOJ) et al
as 3:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Henry Pratt
Defendant:
Homeland Security (DHS), United States Government (USG), Warden Clair Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRATT v. MARSH et al
as 2:2019cv00416
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, DR. ROBERT MARSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JALIL PRATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETTY v. JONES et al
as 1:2017cv02967
Plaintiff:
JULIAN PETTY
Defendant:
JOHN JONES, TYEFA WORTHY, PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law et al v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Darrell Law, Arthur Baugh, Artie Pratt and others
Defendant:
Pierce, Fowler, Warren and others
Movant:
Marcus Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv00291
Petitioner:
Eugene Pratt
Respondent:
Thomas R. Kane , Michael Carvajal and Charles Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ST. JOHN v. KRIMMEL et al
as 1:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOSEPH ST. JOHN
Defendant:
JOHN KRIMMEL, THOMAS HAVERS, STEPHEN PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROOVER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09428
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOSEPH GROOVER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STEPHEN PRATT, BRYAN CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv05627
Plaintiff:
COSTON L. PRATT
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA POLICE and OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
