Cases 11 - 20 of 114
Rosario v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00253
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROSARIO v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ROSARIO
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTIAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSARIO v. HOLLOWOOD et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HOLLOWOOD, C.O.1. PHILLIPS, C.O.1. RIGGLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. SUPERINTENDENT TICE et al
as 5:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
CARLOS A. ROSARIO
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GONZALEZ-ROSARIO
as 2:2022cv04640
In Re:
JEAN CARLOS GONZALEZ-ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosario v. Jamison
as 3:2022cv01488
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosario v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Cook, G. Ralston and J. Rivello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Rosario v. Edward Strawn, et al
as 22-1312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ROSARIO
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD STRAWN, Warden, DEVYN BREESE, Counselor, CAPTAIN RESTANIO and others
Rosario v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv03599
Plaintiff:
HERMAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
