Cases 11 - 20 of 21,434
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 24-2020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMEIA O. SMITH, a/k/a Omar, a/k/a D
TAYLOR v. CO 1 DUNSTON et al
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TAYLOR
Defendant:
CO 1 DUNSTON and THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00914
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
VARGAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06693
Plaintiff:
MAXIMINO VARGAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv02391
Petitioner:
STEVEN MILLER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MELENDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAYMOND MELENDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BUTLER v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2024cv06549
Petitioner:
AHMAR BUTLER
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
