Cases 11 - 20 of 516
Obataiya Scott v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYA SCOTT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandhok v. Washington
as 4:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Angad Singh Chandhok
Respondent:
Warden M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jerome Washington v. Weber
as 23-3260
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MR. WEBER, Psychiatrist/SCI Rockview/Correctional Vendor
Chandhok v. Washington
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Angad Singh Chandhok
Respondent:
M. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gaye v. Washington
as 1:2023cv01987
Petitioner:
Sienemah T. Gaye
Respondent:
Warden Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jerome Washington v. Lynn Patrone, et al
as 23-3273
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LYNN PATRONE, Department of Corrections Mental Health and ROBERT GILMORE, Superintendent of SCI Greene
Jerome Washington v. Myers, et al
as 23-3032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. MYERS and SUPERINTENDENT SALAMON
Jerome Washington v. Salamon, et al
as 23-3053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SALAMON, Over All SCI-Rockview CorrectionalOfficials and Inmates Custody, Care and Control, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT ROWE, LIEUTENANT SEYMOUR and others
Jerome Washington v. Rowe, et al
as 23-3060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DSCS ROWE, Deputy Superintendent and KNAPP, Captain, Unit Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
