Cases 191 - 200 of 85,189
Stephen White v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1799
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WHITE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PHILIP JEDRZEJEK, BILL GOODWIN and others
William Webb, Jr. v. Kirk Neal, et al
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
KIRK NEAL, Corporal at SCI and C/O EDGAR VERDE
Bicking v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Guy Bicking
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent:
MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. USA
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Stephanie Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv05846
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH LLC and HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Dupree Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Briggz, C.O. Robinson, Savasia Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv01227
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, CO3 LT. MR. POSADA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
