Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,816
Murray v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner: William E. Murray
Respondent: Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: R. CRISTINI, E. HURD, D. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Hocker
as 24-1827
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES E. HOCKER
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff: VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant: R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
MCGINNIS v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: VERN E. MCGINNIS, JR.
Defendant: NURSE KAREN HILL, CHCA JANA JORDAN, NURSE KATE HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant: M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff: JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Alvin White, Jr. v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1770
Plaintiff: ALVIN GEORGE WHITE, JR.
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS and MARCIA COMBINE
Jamar Travillion v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1763
Plaintiff: JAMAR L. TRAVILLION
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, in his official capacity as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Secretary of Corrections, OFFICER STOVER, in his individual capacity, OFFICER LOSE, in his individual capacity and others
Joel Muir v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1754
Plaintiff: JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J. FREEMAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?