Cases 21 - 30 of 86
SABIR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
RAFIQ SABIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, WARDEN VICKIE MOSER, LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv07590
Defendant:
CASE MANAGER CRAMER, CARVAJAL, M.D., COUNSELOR BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOMLINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05531
Defendant:
COUNSELOR LEE, JOHN DOES 1-4, UNIT MANAGER MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
FLOYD TOMLINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodwin v. Hawk-Sawyer et al
as 1:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Darrin Howard, DHO Bittenbender, Warden H Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moore v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Case Manager Andrews, United States Of America and Unit Manager Gardea
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Adonis Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bush v. Griffin et al
as 1:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Case Manager Shade, Counselor Griffin, Officer Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2019cv17275
Defendant:
HEAD OF MEDICAL, M. FISHER, DAVID J. STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELSKIS v. UNIT TEAM et al
as 1:2019cv08669
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS
Respondent:
UNIT TEAM, SECRETARY, MILETTA and others
Defendant:
JOHN & JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FITZGERALD v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv07249
Respondent:
R. ROBINSON, CMC MRS. NEVINS, A.W. SMITH and others
Petitioner:
SHIRLAND FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
