Cases 21 - 30 of 228
HARRIS v. COLE et al
as 5:2022cv05147
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
AMY COLE, MOSES MARTINEZ, ERIC S. PENNYPACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ENTO v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2022cv07355
Plaintiff:
Christian David Ento
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and THE STATE OF NEBRASKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Bechtold et al
as 4:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
William Bechtold, Michelle Weller, Jeffrey Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENRY v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
SIDDEEQ HENRY
Defendant:
WARDEN CHRISTIAN SMITH, LIEUTENANT FOX, CAPTAIN OSHENRIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Franzoni et al
as 4:2022cv01686
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Heather Franzoni, Ms. J. Lord, Lt. Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Donatto et al
as 4:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Donatto, Rhoades, Huey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Chloe Walker, Amber Warick, Coran Phiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Deb et al
as 4:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Deb, Carey, Tiffany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUDLEY v. PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC, ET AL
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
CLINTON DEONARD DUDLEY
Defendant:
PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC), CONSELOR SMICK, CONSELOR FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
