Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hector Borrero v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 13-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR BORRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, DAVID CLOSE, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, DAVID KESSLING, FORMER DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CENTRALIZED SERVICES and others
COULSTON v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant:
STEVEN GLUNT, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Fennell v. Randall Britton, et al
as 11-2290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, DAVID CLOSE, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
Ronald Bricker v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, FRED J. RUFFO, WILLIAM AYERS and others
Purcell Bronson v. David Close
as 10-3065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CLOSE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
BRONSON v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2010cv00143
Petitioner:
PURCELL BRONSON
Respondent:
DAVID CLOSE, TOM CORBETT, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bricker v. Ruffo et al
as 1:2009cv01394
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers, Michael W. Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
