Cases 21 - 30 of 81
BRAMHALL v. HAMILTON et al
as 2:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
DEVIN BRAMHALL
Respondent:
HAMILTON, MEIER and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Simington et al
as 1:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez
Defendant:
Robert Simington, Lt. Kenneth Boal, Captain Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Reilly et al
as 2:2021cv03295
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hamilton
Defendant:
John Reilly, DELAWARE COUNTY, Delaware County Board of Prison Inspectors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. GUGGER et al
as 2:2021cv01970
Defendant:
KEVIN SLOAN, DOMINIC O'NEILL, C/O CHAD GUGGER and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE T. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALAN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2021cv01858
Defendant:
HAINES, CHESTER COUNTY PRISON, HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS ESTEBAN LEGARRE GALAN and LUIS ESTEBAN LEGARRETA GALAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSTIE v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2021cv00316
Defendant:
SHANE DADY, MR. NORRIS, MR. HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK A. POSTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUXTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01647
Defendant:
YODIS, MELINDA L. ADAMS, MILLIREN and others
Plaintiff:
ANDY BUXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HAMILTON v. SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK et al
as 3:2020cv01476
Respondent:
The Attorney General Of The State Of Pennsylvania, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and Superintendent, Estock
Petitioner:
Shawn James Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMILTON v. SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK et al
as 2:2020cv03260
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and SUPERINTENDENT, ESTOCK
Petitioner:
SHAWN JAMES HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davila v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00763
Defendant:
Ashley Swineford, Dr. Ball, R. Studlack and others
Plaintiff:
William Davila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
