Cases 21 - 30 of 149
TALLEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv00253
Defendant:
UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, MHM, SGT. BISSELL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02100
Plaintiff:
Abolitionist Law Center, Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project and others
Defendant:
Shirley Moore Smeal, Tabb Bickell, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
Davon R. Hayes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. SGT. WILKENS et al
as 2:2018cv12006
Defendant:
SGT. WILKENS, GEORGE ROBINSON, JOHN DOE (1) and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM MAURICE HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. HAYES et al
as 1:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
EVAN HUGHES
Defendant:
HAYES, KIBBIE, OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. BONDS et al
as 1:2018cv00931
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. HAYES
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYES v. HARRY et al
as 2:2018cv00199
Petitioner:
ELIGAH HAYES
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYES v. BONDS et al
as 1:2017cv13364
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E HAYES
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYES v. SGT. WILKENS et al
as 2:2017cv13182
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM MAURICE HAYES
Defendant:
SGT. WILKENS, GEORGE ROBINSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv01327
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. HAYES
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, TRACEY SHAWLEY, PILLAI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
