Cases 21 - 30 of 34
DALAL v. NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01333
Plaintiff:
AAKASH DALAL
Defendant:
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC., KIBRET MARKOS, MONSY ALVARADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv00782
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GAINES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CLAIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNEY v. KIMBALL et al
as 2:2013cv03126
Plaintiff:
JAMAR BURNEY
Defendant:
M. KIMBALL, MRS. BROWN, HIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2013cv02553
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, BERGEN COUNTY JAIL, JOHN DOE SUPERINTENDENT OF CLIFTON SCHOOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2012cv06098
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
JULIO ALGARIN, JAMES FREY, VINCENT JAMES HIGGINS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PISERCHIA v. BERGEN COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2012cv02520
Plaintiff:
FRANCESCO PISERCHIA
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY POLICE DEPT., SAHEED BAKSH, JEFFREY ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOCKE v. HIGGINS
as 3:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE LOCKE
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRETT v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv04422
Plaintiff:
DONALD BARRETT
Defendant:
LUIAS GIORLA, C. MOLINA, T. OLANIY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODSON v. HIGGINS
as 1:2011cv02358
Plaintiff:
SEAN D. WOODSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY HIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. BEDFORD COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2010cv00183
Defendant:
BEDFORD COUNTY PRISON, DONALD ORR, BEDFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
