Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
James Johnson v. DA Lawrence, et al
as 10-3453
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES E. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: DA LAWRENCE, ATTY GEN PA and BRIAN COLEMAN, SCI Fayette
JOHNSON v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE et al
as 2:2010cv00551
Petitioner: JAMES E. JOHNSON
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE, BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Johnson v. Dominick Derose, et al
as 09-2462
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES DARNELL JOHNSON, a/k/a Robert Anson
Defendant - Appellee: DOMINICK DEROSE, Dauphin County Prison and NICHOLS
Johnson v. DeRose et al
as 4:2008cv01393
Plaintiff: James Darnell Johnson
Defendant: Warden Dominick DeRose and Deputy Warden Nichols
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv04838
Plaintiff: JAMES F. JOHNSON, BILLY MCLEAN, MARCELLUS AUTREY and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03057
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. DAVIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02827
Petitioner: JAMES F. JOHNSON
Respondent: E. DAVIS and S. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01549
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JOHNSON v. PACHOLSKI et al
as 1:2007cv00633
Plaintiff: JAMES F. JOHNSON
Defendant: HERBIK, R. HOOD, WEGIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?