Cases 21 - 30 of 432
Lackey v. USA
as 1:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Maurice Lackey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barry-Gibbons v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00694
Petitioner:
Stephen Maurice Barry-Gibbons
Respondent:
Michael Gourley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Harris v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 23-1551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE MAURICE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Taylor v. City of Philadelphia d/b/a Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Maurice Taylor
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia d/b/a Curran-Fromhold Correctional Facility, Blanche Carney, Pierre Lacombe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ross v. USA
as 1:2023cv00313
Petitioner:
Maurice L. Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NEWSUAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv04183
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
C/O TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWSUAN v. ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv04126
Plaintiff:
MAURICE NEWSUAN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. USA
as 1:2022cv01544
Petitioner:
Maurice Atkinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03934
Plaintiff:
MAURICE LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RICHARDSON v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2022cv05682
Plaintiff:
MAURICE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, MR. CASSANO, KYLE ENGLERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
