Cases 21 - 30 of 82
NEIL v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2019cv16882
Defendant:
OFFICER ZORN, OFFICER M. BUSH, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D NEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIREY v. EMERY et al
as 5:2019cv00535
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, NEIL EMERY, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SHIREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant:
THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2018cv10183
Petitioner:
ROBERT NEIL SAMPSON
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RYANT v. P.A. PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2018cv01848
Plaintiff:
NEIL L. RYANT
Defendant:
P.A. PROBATION AND PAROLE BOARD, STREATY, MARK HATTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neil v. Lynch et al
as 1:2018cv00532
Plaintiff:
Jason T. O'Neil
Defendant:
Lynch, John Doe, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv04547
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ and JESSIE INEZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONS OFFICER MCGEE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BALTIMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTIE v. KUTA et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Petitioner:
OSMOND O'NEIL CHRISTIE
Respondent:
S. M. KUTA and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUCKSHAW v. KANE et al
as 1:2018cv00408
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
NEIL KANE, RODNEY CUNNINGHAM, FREDERICK SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GASTON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2017cv08932
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN O'NEIL GASTON
Respondent:
D. ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
