Cases 21 - 30 of 61
PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PARSONS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02888
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SETH WILLIAMS, CHRISTINA GIARDINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massaquoi v. McConaughey et al
as 3:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Manna Massaquoi
Defendant:
J. McConaughey, T. Deljanovan, S. A. Seese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daughtry v. Kauffman et al
as 3:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Martique Daughtry
Defendant:
Kauffman, Whitesel, Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv05695
Plaintiff:
DANIEL D. PARSONS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2016cv05931
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ANN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
GRACE KIMBROUGH, CAROLINE PARSONS-KANE, THOMAS LAROSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVIN v. STUCKEY et al
as 5:2016cv04910
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN ALLEN HARVIN
Defendant:
DENNIS P. STUCKEY, JOSHUA G. PARSON, CRAIG E. LEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Fields v. Sheila Venable, et al
as 16-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK FIELDS, a/k/a Tyquan Gardner, a/k/a Tyquan Gibbs
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEILA A. VENABLE, CYNTHIA BURCZYK, JENNY ORTEGA and others
WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01089
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN and JASON SWIDERSKI
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, JOHN A. BROWN, MARGARET FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06226
Petitioner:
RANDALL PARSONS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
