Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Batty v. Tennis et al
as 1:2014cv01375
Petitioner:
Warner Ervin Batty, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank J. Tennis and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WARNER v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
LEVON T. WARNER
Defendant:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, DEBRA YOUNKIN, MUHAMMAD J. NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel Duran v. William Warner, et al
as 14-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WILLIAM WARNER, #FIII-606, OFFICER WILLIAM LOGAN, #495, JEREMY NIRENBURG, #K-781 and others
WARNER v. MANGOLD et al
as 2:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
LEVON T. WARNER
Defendant:
PATRICK MANGOLD, PITTS, CURRAN FROMHAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (MED. DEPT.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Duran v. Warner, et al
as 13-3830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WARNER, #FIII-606, WILLIAM LOGAN, #495, JEREMY NIRENBURG, #K-781 and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CITY MUNICIPALITY FUNDS
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY JEFFREY BEARD et al
as 3:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SECRETARY JEFFREY A. BEARD, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. WARNER et al
as 2:2012cv04956
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WARNER, TOOMER, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silverman v. Stevens et al
as 1:2012cv00959
Plaintiff:
Frank Silverman
Defendant:
Stevens, B. Warner, Co. Caree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENNIS v. MR. WEAVER et al
as 2:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HENNIS
Defendant:
MR. WEAVER, MR. VANCE, MR. JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. TRITT et al
as 2:2012cv02573
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. DAVIS
Defendant:
BRENDA TRITT, GAVIN, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
