Cases 31 - 40 of 85,363
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
Sedlak v. USA
as 1:2024cv00913
Petitioner:
Roger Sedlak
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00914
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriquez v. LSCI-Allenwood
as 3:2024cv00920
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillip Rodriquez
Respondent:
Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff:
JASON FLORES
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOWERS
Respondent:
Superintendent Gina Clark and PETER C. ACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NAPPER v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
TYWAN NAPPER
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
