Cases 31 - 40 of 52
David Merritt v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 17-1668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MERRITT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Sears v. Mooney et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Richard Sears
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Trisha Kelley, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERRITT v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06688
Plaintiff:
KAHLEAH VASHAWNNA MERRITT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANSFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2015cv02005
Plaintiff:
MERRITT STANSFIELD
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MERRITT v. GULLO
as 5:2014cv05528
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Defendant:
STEVEN GULLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERRITT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2014cv03209
Petitioner:
ROBERT MERRITT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Merritt v. Pierce et al
as 1:2013cv01734
Petitioner:
David Merritt
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Merritt v. Warden South Woods State Priso
as 13-3901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MERRITT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
MERRITT v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2013cv00898
Petitioner:
ROBERT MERRITT
Respondent:
TODD BUSKIRK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MERRITT v. THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA NORTHAMPTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 5:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA NORTHAMPTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and STEVEN GULLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
