Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Anthony Livingston v. Sherman, et al
as 17-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. LIVINGSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT SHERMAN, LIEUTENANT MILLER and LIEUTENANT AGONES
LOVETT SHERMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07857
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. LOVETT SHERMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond Martin v. Gearhart, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESMOND MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEARHART, Correction Officer, KNIGHT, Correctional Officer Sergeant, RICHARD DAVIS, C.A.S. and others
SHERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv03760
Petitioner:
ROLAND SHERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SHERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03320
Plaintiff:
QOUIRTISE SHERMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Allen v. Special Investigative Supervisor, U.S.P. Pollock et al
as 1:2016cv01209
Plaintiff:
Sherman Allen
Defendant:
Special Investigative Supervisor, U.S.P. Pollock, South Central Regional Director, DSCC Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2016cv02137
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN HOUSER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Darrell Parks v. Andrew Edinger, et al
as 16-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW EDINGER, Medical Doctor, KEVIN PIGOS, Medical Director Doctor, FRANCIS FASCIANA, Mid Level Practioner and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1 ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, #710756-F1
Livingston v. Sherman et al
as 1:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Livingston
Defendant:
Sherman, Miller, Agones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darrell Parks v. S. Argueta, et al
as 15-4074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER S. ARGUETA, CORRECTION OFFICER T. CRAWFORD, J. OLDT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
