Cases 31 - 40 of 123
CARROLL v. WRIGHT
as 5:2019cv00238
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERY D. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANT v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
JEFFREY NASH, MICHAEL W. CARROLL, MRS. KNOX and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. KING et al
as 2:2018cv05415
Defendant:
RICHARD CARROLL and ROGER KING
Plaintiff:
EUGENE JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv04959
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETOFF v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PETOFF
Defendant:
KEVIN SUTTER, MICHAEL HOLMAN, GARY SEYMOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. 61 PA. STATE. 331.21 (1941)
as 2:2017cv04723
Plaintiff:
CARROLL A. WATKINS
Defendant:
61 PA. STATE. 331.21 (1941)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2017cv03312
Receiver:
GARTOR K. BROWN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN K. CRAWFORD, JR., BOBBY CARPENTER, JAMAIL DASIM ROBERTSON and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, TERENCE FARRELL, KATH COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Tice et al
as 3:2017cv01277
Petitioner:
Gerald Carrol Clark, Jr.
Respondent:
Eric Tice and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
