Cases 31 - 40 of 74
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv02672
Plaintiff:
MARKCUS GOODE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard Hill, II v. Z. Edinger, et al
as 15-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD L. HILL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O Z. EDINGER, J. FOURA, Activities Lieutenant, J. SEEBA and others
Ronald Goode v. Louis Gioria, et al
as 14-3008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS GIORIA, Commissioner of Philadelphia Prison System, WARDEN CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and FRANK ABELLO, Deputy Warden in Charge of Security of CFCF
Mackey v. Good
as 1:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Pierre S. Mackey
Defendant:
Adam Good
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOODE v. FARRELL
as 2:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODE v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2013cv06568
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELE FARRELL and FRANK ABELLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY SUSAN MARIE SCOTT et al
as 3:2013cv05791
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY SUSAN MARIE SCOTT, KENNETH NELSON, ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2013cv05603
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv05040
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03682
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER , M. FARRELL , LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
