Cases 31 - 40 of 67
HARRIS v. HYDE et al
as 3:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
BRIAN HYDE, TREVOR WINGARD, HEIDI SROKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MU'MIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
HAMID A. MU'MIN
Defendant:
MARK CAPOZZA, CAROL SCIRE, TAMMIE HOOKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DANIEL GEHLMANN, OFFICER HARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Narduzzi v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv01349
Plaintiff:
Chad C Narduzzi
Defendant:
Richard C Smith, Joseph S Koleno, Pataky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00985
Plaintiff:
Jamie L. Reed
Defendant:
Richard C. Smith, Jeffery Hite, Joe Kaleno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscheim Wilkerson v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 13-4417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSCHEIM WILKERSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CONN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, SNYDER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
WILKERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
ROSCHEIM WILKERSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CONN, CAPTAIN SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINARD v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
CRAIG KINARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM, SUPERINTENDENT ASSIST. HEIDI SROKA, SECURITY LIEUTENANT BAKOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. PITKINS et al
as 3:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
DAVID PITKINS, RONALD COUTTS, THOMAS FULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Folk v. Prime Care Medical et al
as 3:2013cv00474
Plaintiff:
Omar Folk
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Dauphin County Prison, Perry County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.