Cases 31 - 40 of 139
SHOCKLEY-BYRD v. ZAMBRANA et al
as 2:2018cv04845
Plaintiff:
TERRELL SHOCKLEY-BYRD
Defendant:
WARDEN EDWARD D. MCFADDEN, CAPTAIN SERGI and SGT. ZAMBRANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04761
Defendant:
LPN MARKELLE POWELL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENTON A. FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. DOE-MOORE et al
as 2:2018cv04395
Defendant:
CORPORAL JOHN DOE-MOORE, CO1 JOHN DOE DORLEY, SERGEANT JOHN DOE TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. APPLE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER BRIAN QUIRPLE, POLICE OFFICER JASON REID, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv01350
Plaintiff:
MARKUS JAMES THOMAS
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, ROY HAMILTON, GEORGE YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01320
Plaintiff:
TALLI MCFADDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MANUEL SANTIAGO, FRANK JASTRZEMBSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. DALMASI et al
as 2:2017cv05787
Plaintiff:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN
Defendant:
ODEIDA DALMASI, BAKER-BARTLETT, MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. PASSAIC COUNTY
as 2:2017cv11670
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY , ANTHONY J. DE NOVA, III , RICHARD A. ASHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KENDELL SHAREEK MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUISEPPE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GUISEPPE
Defendant:
MCFADDEN , REED , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv03672
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Respondent:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
