Cases 31 - 40 of 114
ROSARIO v. STRAWN et al
as 2:2019cv01040
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RESTANIO, EDWARD STRAWN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RODRIGUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2019cv02771
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ABEL ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSARIO v. READING HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2019cv02170
Defendant:
TROOPER BRIAN ROLAND, MAGISTRAIT ANN L. YOUNG, TROOPER GARY A. WILLIARD, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS A. ROSARIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulino v. USA
as 3:2019cv00019
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Betel Augusto Rosario Paulino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROSARIO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00039
Petitioner:
KEITH ROSARIO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MIRAGLIA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv07944
Petitioner:
ROSARIO MIRAGLIA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSARIO v. DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES et al
as 2:2017cv02971
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CITIZEN SERVICES , DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES , JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2016cv09227
Petitioner:
ANTHONY ROSARIO
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSARIO v. KUTA
as 3:2016cv00261
Petitioner:
JUAN DIONISIO NOBA ROSARIO
Respondent:
SEAN M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSARIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07802
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO ROSARIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
