Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Rushing v. Coupe et al
as 1:2013cv01144
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rushing
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, G.R. Johnson and James Apgar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing et al v. Apgar et al
as 1:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rushing, Tevon Savage and Jamarr L. Campbell
Defendant:
James Apgar, G. R. Johnson and Sussex Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage et al v. Apgar et al
as 1:2013cv01102
Plaintiff:
Tevon Savage, Joseph Rushing and Jamarr L. Campbell
Defendant:
James Apgar, G.R. Johnson and Sussex Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLS v. EASTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2012cv03446
Plaintiff:
KELVIN D. WILLS
Defendant:
EASTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN KRISCHE, BEISER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuhrman v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2011cv01460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Fuhrman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Scott Grove, John T. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANKS v. SENDON et al
as 2:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES FRANKS
Defendant:
JOSEPH SENDON, JOHN DOE, PASQUAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSH v. WISEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv02724
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUSH
Defendant:
MICHAEL WISEMAN, CRISTI CHARPENTIER, MAUREEN KEARNEY ROWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey v. Blessing et al
as 1:2011cv00436
Defendant:
D Blessing , Ruth Rush , Herr and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Sniezek et al
as 1:2010cv02638
Plaintiff:
John Ferguson
Defendant:
T. R. Sniezek , Russell C. Hendershot , Kim Ask-Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
