Cases 31 - 40 of 1,637
VILLAGRAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv04123
Petitioner:
JEREMY VILLAGRAN
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAZOS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAZOS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT and DIRECTOR OF NURSES MAXIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Vitalcare Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Defendant:
Vitalcare Health Strategies, LLC, Chardonnay Dialysis, Inc., Dr. Aweke Aduku-Ezeh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERMAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CAPTAIN DILLIE and SGT. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK S. KING
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, MAXIM CASAS and HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obataiya Scott v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYA SCOTT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
TAYLOR v. KLINEFELTER
as 2:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Chruby v. Kirk Bearjar, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant:
KIRK BEARJAR, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, JENNIFER SHROCK and others
VISALDEN-DIAZ et al v. CASAS et al
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
ERIC A. VISALDEN-DIAZ, BRIONNE CUFF, TERRY STOCKS and others
Defendant:
MAXIM CASAS and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
