Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Brooks-Bey v. Schmerfelt et al
as 1:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
George Rahsaan Brooks-Bey
Defendant:
Schmerfelt, Sharon Luquis, Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Sterling v. Randall Britton, et al
as 10-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D STERLING
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, ATTY GEN PA and DA YORK CTY
Wesley v. Sterling
as 4:2008cv02034
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wesley
Defendant:
Scott Sterling
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. Folino
as 3:2008cv01846
Petitioner:
Sterling Ellis
Respondent:
Louis Folino and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demetrius Bailey, et al v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-1768
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING, VICTOR BROWN, JOSEPH B.X. SAMPLE and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, DONALD VAUGHN, ROBERT SHANNON and others
Wesley v. Sterling et al
as 4:2008cv00492
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wesley
Defendant:
Scott Sterling, Barbara Malewsici and Donna Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sterling v. Britton et al
as 1:2008cv00451
Petitioner:
Charles D. Sterling
Respondent:
Randall Britton, The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania and The District Attorney of the County of York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STERLING v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2008cv00313
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. STERLING
Defendant:
RANDALL BRITTON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATTIS v. DOHMAN et al
as 2:2005cv00465
Plaintiff:
TREVOR MATTIS
Defendant:
DOHMAN, D. VAUGHN, SHARON BURKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. WYDNER et al
as 2:2007cv02130
Petitioner:
STERLING MATHIS
Respondent:
JAMES WYDNER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYNN ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF THOMAS CORBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
