Cases 31 - 40 of 537
EPPS v. MCGINLEY, SUP'T SCI COAL TOWNSHIP
as 2:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
KEITH EPPS
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv05580
Plaintiff:
SHEIK MUJAHID BAHIR J ALI
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, GOVERNOR TOM WOLF, CHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIORDANO v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2021cv20482
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIORDANO
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP, TOMS RIVER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talbert v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv01906
Plaintiff:
Charles Talbert
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Tom Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAPHART v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01546
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. LEAPHART
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY SMITH, BOBBI JO SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Krushin v. Wolff et al
as 4:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krushin
Defendant:
Tom Wolff, Joshua Shapiro, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. LORAH et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
MARQUICE EVANS
Defendant:
RICHARD LORAH, DETECTIVE SEAN BOGART, TOM ROBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STAATS v. GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE:JOHN CARNEY et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE:JOHN CARNEY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY: JOHN WETZEL, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA: TOM WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE STAATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter v. Coons, et al.
as 1:2021cv00859
Defendant:
Tom Carper, U.S. Congress and Chris Coons
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
