Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Smith v. SCI Benner et al
as 1:2018cv01751
Defendant:
SCI Benner and Ricky L. Sherman
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadlington v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2018cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ethan Wadlington
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, John Doe, SCI Benner Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
SCI Benner Township and Rickey L. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. HEAD OF MEDICAL et al
as 3:2018cv00338
Plaintiff:
Scott Fisher
Defendant:
Head of Medical and SCI Benner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. HEAD OF MEDICAL et al
as 1:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FISHER
Defendant:
HEAD OF MEDICAL and SCI BENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01606
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant:
S.C.I. BENNER TOWNSHIP and RICKEY L. SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley et al v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2017cv01632
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley, Minorities of Pennsylvania and PA. Americans with Disabilities
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Centre County's Courthouse, District Attorney's Office of Centre County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. GIMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00996
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
R. GILMORE, M. ZAKEN, LEGGET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. GILL et al
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
AARON VAUGHN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL, S.C .I. GREENE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL AND HIS CO-WORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. SCI-BENNER et al
as 2:2017cv01514
Petitioner:
ROBBIE O. THOMAS
Respondent:
SCI-BENNER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
