Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Rogel Grant v. Mark Baldwin, et al
as 13-3438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGEL GRANT
Defendant:
MARK BALDWIN, THERESA JOHNSON, FRANCIS C. BARBIERI, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Pedro Vializ-Vega v. Jerome Walsh, et al
as 13-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO VIALIZ-VEGA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME WALSH, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
Gibson v. Walsh
as 1:2012cv02443
Petitioner:
Vegas Gibson
Respondent:
Jerome Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOCADIA v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION et al
as 5:2012cv05671
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. LOCADIA
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION, CARMEN DELVALLE, TONI DELVALLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VEGA v. HUGHES et al
as 2:2012cv04007
Petitioner:
ANTHONY VEGA
Respondent:
C. RAY HUGHES and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOYER v. MOHRING et al
as 5:2012cv02267
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E. BOYER
Defendant:
DEBORA MOHRING, BYRON RICE, GERARDO VEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. HINES et al
as 2:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
HUMBERTO VEGA SANTIAGO
Defendant:
HINES , LOVETT , JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olguin v. Burgerhoff et al
as 1:2012cv00003
Plaintiff:
Marcos A Olguin
Defendant:
Burgerhoff, Kabonick, Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAHAM et al v. OTTINO et al
as 2:2011cv07125
Plaintiff:
RAFIEEK GRAHAM and THADDEUS THOMAS
Defendant:
JACYLEN OTTINO, SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS, MERRIL MAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEGA v. MILLER et al
as 2:2011cv07224
Plaintiff:
PETER VEGA
Defendant:
VIVIAN T. MILLER, CAROLYN FRIEND and SETH WILLIAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
