Cases 41 - 50 of 460
Anderson v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01075
Petitioner:
Hakim Anderson
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Charles Head v. USA, et al
as 22-2068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES R. CARR, JR., MATTHEW MORRIS and others
Gregory Ezeani v. William Anderson
as 22-2038
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGELINA NKOLI OKWUEGO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GREGORY IFESINACHI EZEANI
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Warden, Essex County Corrections
Appellee:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC
ANDERSON v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2022cv04787
Petitioner:
CHINUA ANDERSON
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WELTY v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
MR. ANDERSON, MR. LONG, MR. CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. English et al
as 1:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jason Anderson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer I English and Corrections Office I Wisenburger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rodney Anderson
Defendant:
K. Kauffman, J. Rivello, Ms. C. Neri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON
as 2:2022cv00677
In Re:
MALIK ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CREWS v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH CREWS
Defendant:
DAVID ANDERSON, RAQUEL DESTEFANO, MARK CHASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MARK S. MURRAY, GARY CHESNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
