Cases 41 - 50 of 273
JOHNSON et al v. CLAYHURST et al
as 2:2021cv04156
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON, LESSIE POWELL, RASHID POWELL and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLAYHURST, JILL BRADY, GORDON GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv03367
Petitioner:
BRYANT JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv03075
Petitioner:
BRYANT A RICHARD and RICHARD A. BRYANT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ERIC ARMEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE KRASNER, ESQ, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02877
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
as 2:2021cv01255
Petitioner:
BRYANT JOHNSON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF:
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. RADDAD
as 2:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL BRYANT
Defendant:
RADDAD, HANDY, KILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREENY v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv18278
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY, ERIC FAGEN, JOHN DOE #5 and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FREENY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITNEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv03855
Petitioner:
BRYANT K. WHITNEY
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. HARPER et al
as 2:2020cv01051
Defendant:
RN WILLIAMS, JANE DOES, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
MARLYNN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRYANT v. HICKS et al
as 3:2020cv06697
Defendant:
T. PHILLIPS, DAVE RICHARDS, OFC. PINTO and others
Plaintiff:
SHAKEEM T. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
