Cases 41 - 50 of 55
CARR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00254
Petitioner:
JEFFREY CARR
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and JEROME R. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, Mary Lou Blades, Ms. Barbara and others
Defendant:
Stanley Taylor, Carl Danberg and Department of Corrections Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Danberg et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Vincent Carr, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. DIEBERT et al
as 3:2013cv01399
Plaintiff:
Jacob Jay Rivera
Defendant:
Diebert, I and M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. DIEBERT et al
as 2:2013cv00932
Plaintiff:
JACOB JAY RIVERA
Defendant:
DIEBERT, I and M. CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okey v. Strebig et al
as 1:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Patrick Okey
Defendant:
Daniel Strebig and Lo. Carre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. FRICK et al
as 2:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
SALLY FRICK, GEORGE BILLS, JAMES WYMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. CASHMAN, et al
as 2:2011cv01280
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID CASHMAN, BRIAN HAENZE, DENISE HAENZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. TAYLOR
as 1:2011cv05425
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CARR
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRADER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2011cv01757
Petitioner:
OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, KAREN L. GRIGSBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
