Cases 41 - 50 of 259
MANNY v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
ELLIS MANNY and MANNY ELLIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ABNER v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv15359
Plaintiff:
DESAWN ABNER and DESHAWN ABNER
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv15362
Plaintiff:
EVERETT J. DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, BRIAN M. HUGHES and C.F.G. HEALTH SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv14101
Plaintiff:
ISIAH T. GREENE
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, CFH HEALTH SERVICES INC., MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv12498
Defendant:
CHARLES PETERSON, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, C.F.G. HEALTH SERVICE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBINSON and THOMAS RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. CFG HEALTH SERVICES INC. et al
as 3:2021cv13354
Plaintiff:
TONY BUTLER
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SERVICES INC. and CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKMAN v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv11309
Plaintiff:
DARRYL PARKMAN
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SERVICES LLC, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, BRIAN M. HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv13625
Plaintiff:
KLAY JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, BRIAN HUGES, C.F.G. HEALTH SERVICE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Connections Community Support Programs, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00660
Defendant:
Dana Metzger, Herman M. Ellis, Marc Richman and others
Plaintiff:
Charlene Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2021cv09443
Plaintiff:
AOLE BLACKMAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
LINDA FERNANDEZ, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
