Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Angelo Clark v. Reginal Medical First Corr, et al
as 09-1171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
REGINAL MEDICAL FIRST CORRECTIONAL, ANGELA WILSON, Manager, ROBERT HOOPER, Regional Manager and others
KENNY v. NEWHOUSE et al
as 2:2008cv01493
Plaintiff:
RICARDO KENNY
Defendant:
NEWHOUSE, GUTY, MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Williamson et al
as 4:2008cv02009
Plaintiff:
Raheem Davis
Defendant:
Williamson, Flemmings and Hooper
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Robert Hankins v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC ARMEL, JEFFREY BEARD, ROBERT BITNER and others
Defendant:
MARSH, H. CLIFFORD O'HARA, KECK and others
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2008cv00219
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
DONALD KELCHNER, MARK KRYSEVIG, BLAINE STEIGERWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NIFAS vs. BEARD et al.
as 2:2008cv00834
Plaintiff:
RASHEED NIFAS
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, DAVID J. WAKFIELD, HARRY E. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Warden of Allenwood et al
as 3:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Defendant:
Warden of Allenwood, Lappis, Michael Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HAMM v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
ANCELL HAMM
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL, TOM CORBETT, HARRY WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrin Robinson v. Phillip Johnson, et al
as 08-1818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH ESSEDY, JEFFREY FORTE, DANIEL HOOPER and others
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
JEFFARY A. BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
