Cases 41 - 50 of 244
Muhammad v. C.O. Houser et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
C.O. Houser, C.O. Steward, C.O. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COSGROVE v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2021cv00124
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00780
Defendant:
IZZAT-AL DOUN-BAUTH PARTY OF IRAQ, ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH DIOCEASE OF PITTSBURGH, CHRIS ISLAM OF NIGERIA and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, Sr., ERNEST POOH THORTON and JAMES M. WHITEY BULGER MAFIA MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COSGROVE v. WELLPATH et al
as 3:2021cv00092
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
JAMES COSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2021cv01644
Plaintiff:
CARLOW GLOVER and CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MARY ANN SWIFT, P/O/ KEITH QUICK, P/O CPL. W SHIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Evans et al
as 1:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Sgt. Evans, Counselor Moyal, C.O. Houser and others
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. WARDEN OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2020cv15606
Petitioner:
KHALEE MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN OF ESSEX COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. NAJI et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
DR. JAY COWAN and DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
SAVOY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
MUHAMMAD v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2020cv04313
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, KEVIN RANSOM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
