Cases 41 - 50 of 337
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. JAIME SORBER and JANE/JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Warden of SCI-Huntingdon et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
Terrance Xavier Perez
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Huntingdon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04796
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BADGER v. PEREZ et al
as 5:2021cv04747
Plaintiff:
PETER BADGER
Defendant:
JUSTIN PEREZ, DENNIS RIVAS, MATTHEW BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUAREZ-PEREZ v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2021cv15948
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SUAREZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Brittain, et al
as 3:2021cv01039
Petitioner:
Juan Jose Perez
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Warden May et al
as 1:2021cv00708
Defendant:
Warden May, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis, Captain Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Tye Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. SCI FAYETTE SUPERINTENDANT JOHN/JANE DOE et al
as 2:2021cv00332
Defendant:
CITY OF LABELLE PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES BARNACLE, ANY AND ALL JOHN/JANE DOE DEFENDANTS SCI FAYETTE and others
Plaintiff:
PERCY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Perez v. Warden May et al
as 1:2021cv00548
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Delaware and Warden May
Petitioner:
Daniel Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 3:2021cv00292
Defendant:
Coleen Orzel, The Dentist, Derek Lavelle and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
