Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Fowler v. Tennis et al
as 3:2009cv01726
Plaintiff:
William J. Fowler
Defendant:
Franklin J. Tennis, Jeffrey A Beard, R. Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Royster v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 09-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROYSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORCETTIE, A.D. A., ROBERT MILLS and others
ROYSTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05661
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROYSTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, A.D.A. FORCETTIE, ROBERT MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YOUNGER v. P.I.C.C. ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2008cv02554
Plaintiff:
ANDR'E L. YOUNGER
Defendant:
P.I.C.C. ADMINISTRATION, LEON KING, JOYCE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YOUNGER v. P.I.C.C. ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2008cv01180
Plaintiff:
ANDR'E L. YOUNGER
Defendant:
P.I.C.C. ADMINISTRATION, LEON KING, JOYCE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YOUNGER v. P.I.C.C. ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2008cv00949
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L. YOUNGER
Defendant:
P.I.C.C. ADMINISTRATION, JOYCE ADAMS, T. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKE v. HUGHES et al
as 2:2007cv02272
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LOCKE
Defendant:
RENEE CALDWELL. HUGHES, LYNNE. ABRAHAM, JAMES. BERARDINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALLOY v. KEANE et al
as 2:2007cv02583
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MALLOY
Defendant:
B. KEANE, M. ROGERS, J. MONRAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Albudairy v. Deiter et al
as 3:2007cv00702
Plaintiff:
Wael Albudairy
Defendant:
Deiter, Higgins and L. T. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2007cv00460
Petitioner:
FRANK T. MILLER
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
