Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,234
KWASNIK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01363
Petitioner: MICHAEL W. KWASNIK
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CORDERO-REZABALA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv04010
Petitioner: JORGE EMILIO CORDERO-REZABALA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff: JAMES GOODE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff: SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant: K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff: MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MR. PERKINS
Womack v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00658
Petitioner: Christian Dior Womack
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner: LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stephan Byrd v. USA
as 24-1647
Plaintiff: STEPHAN BYRD
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sheng-Wen Cheng v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1645
Plaintiff: SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Alexander Ros Lazo
as 24-1662
Petitioner: ALEXANDER ROS LAZO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?