Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Michael Beenick, Jr. v. Michael LeFebvre, et al
as 16-3855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BEENICK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEFEBVRE, LEE MANDICHAK-MCCONNELL, WALLACE DITTSWORTH and others
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Thomas Liddell v. New Jersey Department of Corre, et al
as 16-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LIDDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, BERNARD GOODWIN, ADMINISTRATOR and others
WEAVER v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2016cv04811
Petitioner:
LOVELLE KINON WEAVER
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kadir v. Maiorana
as 3:2016cv01814
Plaintiff:
Abdul Kadir
Defendant:
C. Maiorana, Gilley, M. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADFORD v. WEAVER et al
as 2:2016cv04510
Plaintiff:
LEE BRADFORD
Defendant:
SCOTT WEAVER, MORRISTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, R. SHEARER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsmith v. Franklin County et al
as 3:2016cv00952
Plaintiff:
Norman Goldsmith
Defendant:
Franklin County, Samples, Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Shakur Gannaway v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 16-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMP HILL SCI, LIZHONG, ADAPT INC, etc al, William Tillman and others
Robert Reyes v. A. Jordan, et al
as 15-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT REYES
Defendant - Appellee:
A. JORDAN, R. WEAVER, HOUSER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
