Cases 51 - 60 of 138
HEATH v. GILMORE
as 2:2015cv00880
Petitioner:
YARDEN HEATH
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan Heath v. George Whipple
as 14-4302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORDAN HEATH
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O GEORGE EDWARD WHIPPLE, Correction Officer
Milhouse v. Mottern et al
as 1:2014cv01972
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
G. Mottern, Susan V. Heath and H. Boussag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boomer v. United States of America, Dept of Justice et al
as 3:2014cv01692
Plaintiff:
Rodney Boomer
Defendant:
United States of America, Dept of Justice, Charles Samuels, Jr., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. Zickfoose et al
as 1:2014cv01675
Plaintiff:
Leroy Porter
Defendant:
Donna Zickfoose, K. Gabriclson, C. Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Milhouse v. Heath et al
as 1:2014cv01637
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
Susan V. Heath and ERB Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gray v. Gilmore et al
as 3:2014cv01595
Petitioner:
Heath Gray
Respondent:
Robert Gilmore and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Heath v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 14-1853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HEATH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, JOHN KERESTES, Dept. Supt. for Fracilities Management of SCI Frackville Prison, BARBARA MALEWSKI, Chief Healthcare Administrator of FCI Frackville Prison and others
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen v. Zickefoose et al
as 4:2014cv00098
Petitioner:
John E. Chen
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose, Heath and Jenlah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
